论“足以排除强制执行的民事权益”的判断标准——以借名买房和股权代持行为的类型化为中心
作者:
作者单位:

华东政法大学法律学院

作者简介:

唐文翰,男,主要研究方向为民商法。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

DF72

基金项目:


Research on the Standard of “Sufficiency of Excluding the Enforcement of Civil Rights and Interests”——Based on the Typification of Title House in other's Name and Shareholding Entrustment Behaviors
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Law, East China University of Political Science and Law

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    案外人异议之诉的制度目的是缓和强制执行的效率优先。“足以排除强制执行的民事权益”的判断,为实体法和程序法交错的问题。权利外观与实际分离的民事权益中,最为典型的为借名买房和股权代持,其类型化具有举重以明轻的意义。代持行为法“足以排除强制执行”判 断,需要考量实体法权利的优先性、申请执行人的信赖利益及执行债权的优先性。原则上隐名权利人不享有“足以排除强制执行的民事权益”,但在涉及生存利益保障和执行申请人不具有信赖利益时,可例外的赋予其排除力。

    Abstract:

    The purpose of the outsider’s objection suit is to mitigate the supremacy of efficiency that executive procedure abides to. The standard of“Sufficiency of Excluding the Enforcement of Civil Rights and Interests” involves both substantive and procedure laws. Among these cases, title house in another’s name and shareholding entrustment behaviors are typical and of great significance. Judgment of the act on behalf of the law“enough to exclude enforcement”needs to consider the priority of substantive law rights, the trust interest of the applicant and the priority of enforcement of creditor’s rights. In principle, the anonymous rights holder does not enjoy“enough civil rights to exclude enforcement”, but when it comes to the protection of survival interests and the enforcement applicant does not have a trusting interest, it can be given an exclusion force exceptionally.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-03-31
  • 出版日期: