Violent strikes often have dual functions. On the one hand, the existence of violent strike has negative effectof various degrees on relations between labor and capital; on the other hand, under certain conditions, the pressure imposed by violent strikes can also be transformed into different reform practices and becomean important driving force to govern strikes. From the perspective of game theory, the formation logic and governance logic of violent strikes are explored, which is an important path to promote the transformation of conflict between labor and capital into consultation and cooperation.