家事纠纷法院调解的范围与限度——基于比较法的分析
作者:
作者单位:

南京航空航天大学人文与社会科学学院

作者简介:

汤鸣,女,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为民事诉讼法。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D925.1

基金项目:

教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC820094);; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(NR2013009)


Scope and Limitation of Conciliation of Family Disputes in Court:a Comparative Analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Humanities and Social Sciences,Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为适应家事纠纷的特殊性,促成当事人自律的解决纷争,有必要实现调解制度的专门化,构建我国的家事调解制度。家事调解的纠纷的类型包括离婚、抚养、赡养、收养和继承案件。借鉴域外经验,我国宜将非讼性质较强,且当事人无处分权的案件以及当事人存在双方力量显著失衡、无调解诚意或无完全民事行为能力情形的诉讼案件,排除在家事调解的范围之外。将有家庭暴力因素的案件纳入调解范围,在调解中需要特别对待。家事调解是有限度的,调解不可能解决所有的家事纠纷,也不应通过调解解决所有家事纠纷。

    Abstract:

    In order to adapt to the particularity of family disputes and to facilitate the parties to settle disputes, it is necessary to realize the specialization of mediation system and build China's family mediation system. The types of disputes in family mediation include divorce, upbringing, support, adoption, and succession cases. Learning from foreign experience, China should exclude outside the scope of family mediation the cases of stronger non- contentious nature which the parties have no right to dispose of,the cases in which the parties are significantly imbalanced in strength, the cases in which the parties have no intention in mediation, and the cases in which the parties do have full civil capacity. Cases involving domestic violence should be included into the scope of mediation and need special treatment in mediation. Family mediation is limited, mediation cannot solve all family disputes, and not all family disputes should be resolved through mediation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-25
  • 出版日期: