欧盟法视野下过境货物的海关执法措施:程序法向实体法的演变
作者:
作者单位:

武汉大学国际法研究所

作者简介:

杨帆,男,主要研究方向为欧盟法、国际知识产权法。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D997

基金项目:

国家社科基金重点项目(13AFX028)


Customs Enforcement of IP Law against Goods In-Transit in View of EU Law:From Procedural Law to Substantial Law
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Law, Wuhan University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    欧盟法院在Polo Lauren案中的判决确认了以3295/94号条例为法律基础的"生产假设理论",使得成员国可以根据本国国内法对过境货物进行扣押。这引起了自由贸易主义者的反对,随后发生的印度仿药过境运输案引起了欧盟对过境货物执法措施的反思,欧盟法院在著名的Nokia/Philips案中做出的初步裁决以及旨在撤销备受争议的1383/2003号条例的608/2013号条例的出台,很大程度上减轻了外界对欧盟海关措施的质疑,随着欧盟开始着手修改商标条例,标志着欧盟对过境货物的规制转移到实体法层面上来。

    Abstract:

    The decision of ECJ in Polo Lauren case confirmed the regulation 3295/94 as the legal basis of manufacturing fiction theory, which enables its member to detain goods in-transit on the basis of its domestic law. This decision arouses opposition from trade liberalists. The following Indian-EU generic drug case leads to a reflection of border measures by EU, the ECJ's preliminary decision in the famous NOKIA/ Philips case and the enforcement of regulation 608/2013 removed doubts on EU customs measures;however, with EU's action to amend its trademark regulation, EU has diverted its attention of regulating goods in-transit to substantial law level.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-25
  • 出版日期: