《民法典》背景下野生动物类犯罪的侵害法益研究
作者:
作者单位:

东南大学法学院

作者简介:

陈禹衡,男,博士研究生,主要研究方向为刑法学。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D922.68

基金项目:

中国法学会法学研究课题(CLS(2016)D52);司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(15SFB2031);江苏高校哲 学社会科学重点研究基地项目(2015ZSJD002)。


Research on the Infringement of Legal Interests in Wildlife Crime under the Background of Civil Code
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Law, Southeast University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在由传统社会向风险社会的转型过程中,传统法益论针对野生动物类犯罪的刑法规制存在困局。以往野生动物类犯罪的侵害法益,有秩序法益说和实质法益说之争,其中的野生动物资源说最为准确。《民法典》强调绿色原则,伴随动物权利说的兴起,意味着在野生动物犯罪的侵害法益中更侧重生态法益,并对生态法益进行经济化改造。在风险社会背景下,应该采用多种法益并重的模式,尝试引入社会风险法益论,将被忽视的社会风险作为侵害法益,考虑野生动物类犯罪对社会整体产生的损害。

    Abstract:

    After the promulgation of the Civil Code, in the process of transforming from a traditional society to a risk society, there are difficulties in the regulation of criminal law against wildlife crimes under the traditional theory of legal interests. In the past, there have been disputes between the infringement of legal interests, the or? derly law and the substantial law, among which the theory of wildlife resources is the most accurate in the tradi? tional society. However, after the promulgation of the Civil Code, the emphasis on the green principle and the rise of animal rights theory mean that ecological legal interests should be paid more attention to in the infringe? ment of legal interests of wildlife crimes, and ecological legal interests should be economically reformed. In the risk society, we should adopt the mode of emphasizing both legal benefits and social risks, try to introduce the theory of social systemic risks, take the neglected social risks as the infringement legal benefits, and consider the damage to the whole society caused by wildlife crime.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-03-24
  • 出版日期: