异种自由刑并罚问题的立法价值抉择与漏洞解释填补
作者:
作者单位:

上海政法学院刑事司法学院

作者简介:

申长征,男,主要研究方向为刑法学、青少年犯罪与司法。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D924.1

基金项目:


Legal Valuable Choice and Loophole Explanation upon the Combination of Different Kinds of Imprisonment
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Criminal Justice, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在异种自由刑并罚问题上,换算原则在理论与实务中得到较多支持但尚未为《刑法修正案(九)》所采纳。在先罪为管制刑后出现漏罪或新罪应处有期徒刑或拘役的情况下,应当结合人身危险性以司法解释的形式列举具体罪名加以明确。在与上诉不加刑原则相结合时,刑事诉讼法司法解释第三百二十五条第二款第三项具有不合理之处。刑罚裁量追求个别化,刑罚执行追求社会化,刑法第六十九条第二款的规定在一定程度上反映了未来刑罚制度改革的方向。异种自由刑并罚问题归根到底是抽象的法价值与具体法制度之间的鸿沟,欲要平息在具体司法实践中的疑难问题,应当在坚持刑法基本原则精神的基础上进一步探索。

    Abstract:

    Considering the combined punishment of different kinds of imprisonment, the conversion principle is theoretically and practically accepted but not admitted by the criminal code. When the punishment of imprisonment comes after the punishment without imprisonment, the judicial interpretation should specify the charge considering the dangerousness to the person. Combining the principle of no appeal resulting in additional punishment, the judicial interpretation of criminal procedural law should be irrational. The individual value of measuring a penalty and the social value of executing a penalty is reflected by the criminal code article 69, paragraph 2 development in the future to a certain degree. To fix the complicated problems resulted by the essential gap between the abstract value and the concrete system of law, further exploration should be commenced under the basic spirit of criminal law.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-03-29
  • 出版日期: